FirsthandHealth
medRxiv PreprintsInternational8 November 2026

Methodological Adherence, Reporting Completeness, and Risk of Bias in AI-Assisted Systematic Reviews: A Matched Meta-Research Study

This is an official announcement record

Firsthand records what medRxiv Preprints announced and links to the original. The wording below is theirs, not ours.

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used to accelerate systematic reviews that inform clinical practice and policy. However, evidence on the methodological adherence, reporting completeness, and risk of bias of completed AI-assisted reviews is limited. Objective: To compare methodological adherence, reporting completeness, and risk of bias between published systematic reviews with reported AI assistance and matched reviews with no reported AI use, and to assess AI-use transparency. Methods: We conducted a matched-cohort meta-research study of English-language, peer-reviewe
Source: medRxiv Preprints
Read the official announcement

Opens www.medrxiv.org

More from medRxiv Preprints

This content is for informational purposes only and is not medical advice. It is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. Consult a healthcare professional before starting any supplement, treatment, or program: especially if you are pregnant, nursing, taking medication, or managing a health condition.