FirsthandHealth
medRxiv PreprintsInternational11 October 2026

Quantifying Systematic Bias in Observational Causal Estimates Using Negative Controls: The Bias Attribution Fraction

This is an official announcement record

Firsthand records what medRxiv Preprints announced and links to the original. The wording below is theirs, not ours.

Importance. Observational studies dominate evidence in cardiovascular outcomes research, yet no widely adopted reporting standard requires authors to disclose how much of an observed association is attributable to systematic error. The negative-control calibration framework of the Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics consortium returns a binary answer: a calibrated P-value either crosses 0.05 or it does not. That answer conflates "is there a signal" with "is the signal credible." Objective. To define the Bias Attribution Fraction (BAF), a continuous estimator in [0, 1] that quant
— medRxiv Preprints
Read the official announcement

Opens www.medrxiv.org

More from medRxiv Preprints

This content is for informational purposes only and is not medical advice. It is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. Consult a healthcare professional before starting any supplement, treatment, or program — especially if you are pregnant, nursing, taking medication, or managing a health condition.