Pulsed Field Versus Radiofrequency Ablation For Repeat Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Evaluation of Outcomes

Background Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) has recently been approved in the USA as a new method for treating atrial fibrillation (AF). PFA provides a promising new approach in the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF), which historically has a high recurrence rate post-ablation. Of significance, PFA has shown promising data in terms of safety and procedural efficiency to radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Objective The purpose of this study was to compare the procedural and health outcomes in patients with recurrent AF undergoing ablation using PFA or RFA. Methods Consecutive patients with a history

This content is for informational purposes only and is not medical advice. It is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. Consult a healthcare professional before starting any supplement, treatment, or program — especially if you are pregnant, nursing, taking medication, or managing a health condition.