Intra-Patient Comparison of a Minimally Invasive Lid Treatment and Traditional Blepharoplasty: Patient and Surgeon-Reported Outcomes

Abstract Purpose: To use a minimally invasive lid treatment (MILT) utilizing Compressive Skin Contouring (CoCo) technology to compare patient- and surgeon-reported ecchymosis, edema, and incision appearance following MILT and traditional upper eyelid blepharoplasty (tBULB). Methods: Prospective, single-surgeon intra-patient study comparing MILT and tBULB in patients seen for bilateral blepharoplasty. Patients and the operating surgeon rated MILT and tBULB outcomes post-operatively on the day of surgery (T1) and at 2 months (T2) using surveys. Patient photographs taken 3 and 9 days post-operati

This content is for informational purposes only and is not medical advice. It is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. Consult a healthcare professional before starting any supplement, treatment, or program — especially if you are pregnant, nursing, taking medication, or managing a health condition.